tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2418172715166954378.post2249252423495629879..comments2014-11-28T06:19:41.857-08:00Comments on Gnubridge development: Build and Continuous Integration on Small ProjectsAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13749595260439863475noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2418172715166954378.post-76551267808286433352009-10-04T21:23:53.193-07:002009-10-04T21:23:53.193-07:00Good point. I see CI server solution as more scala...Good point. I see CI server solution as more scalable when additional developers contribute to the project. In the meantime, search space is so large, that better test design is where the time is best invested.<br /><br />There are very limited options for free CI hosting I could find. Gnubridge is hosted with <a href="http://www.viewtier.com/products/parabuild/index.htm" rel="nofollow">Parabuild</a>. Another one I'd consider looking into is <a href="http://runcoderun.com/" rel="nofollow">runcoderun</a>.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13749595260439863475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2418172715166954378.post-21919902889698854362009-10-02T19:59:50.376-07:002009-10-02T19:59:50.376-07:00I have a question for you about the use of stochas...I have a question for you about the use of stochastic tests on the CI server. You mention early on that their are limits to CPU use on the CI server that are much lower than your personal machine. Won't these limits reduce the effectiveness of using stochastic tests? That is you will only be able to run 1000 of them instead of a million and are therefore much less likely to find a problem than you would be on a less limited machine? <br /><br />Also, can you give us some details about the service you're using to host your CI server? <br /><br />Thanks!Kenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08343315799450728360noreply@blogger.com